10 Weird U.S. Photography Laws You Didn't Know Existed

Photography law in the United States is a patchwork of federal statutes, state regulations, municipal ordinances, and property rules that interact in complicated and sometimes contradictory ways. Most of it is straightforward: you can photograph in public spaces, you cannot photograph where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and commercial use of someone's likeness generally requires a release. But then there's the other layer — the old, the obscure, the genuinely bizarre.

Some of the laws below are actively enforced. Some are historical relics that remain on the books but haven't been tested in court in decades. All of them are real, and all of them tell you something interesting about the intersections of photography, culture, and the law in different parts of the country.

As a Massachusetts-based photographer who shoots everything from actor headshots to family portraits, I find this stuff genuinely fascinating — and occasionally professionally relevant.

1. No Photographing Whales from Aircraft in Massachusetts

Massachusetts takes marine mammal protection seriously. Under both state law and the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act, approaching whales in ways that could disturb them is prohibited — and that prohibition extends to low-flying aircraft used to photograph or observe whales from above.

The practical reasoning behind this law is sound. Low-flying planes and helicopters create noise and air disturbance that can disorient or stress whales, interfere with their feeding and communication, and contribute to the larger problem of human harassment of marine mammals. Humpback whales, fin whales, and right whales are all present in Massachusetts Bay waters, and the right whale in particular is critically endangered.

For Massachusetts photographers, this means the aerial whale photography you see in National Geographic is heavily regulated and requires specific permits. Drone photography of whales from the water's surface is a separate question governed by FAA regulations and varies by proximity. When in doubt, consult the NOAA guidelines before you fly.

2. Flash Photography Near Dwellings in Nevada

Nevada has an old statute that prohibits using flash photography within 500 feet of a dwelling without the owner's permission. The origin of this law predates digital photography and probably predates flash bulbs as we know them — it may have roots in magnesium powder flash photography of the early 20th century, which created both blinding light and occasionally small fires.

In practice, the Las Vegas Strip is a highly photographed environment where this law is almost never enforced — the city's entire economy depends on visitors taking photographs. But the law technically exists, and in quieter residential areas, a photographer using powerful strobe equipment near residential windows could theoretically be cited under it.

This is a good reminder that old laws don't always disappear just because the technology they were written to address has changed.

3. Photographing Giraffes Tied to Telephone Poles in Atlanta, Georgia

Atlanta, Georgia has a municipal ordinance making it illegal to tie a giraffe to a telephone pole or street lamp. The law doesn't specifically mention photography, but capturing the scene of a giraffe illegally secured to city infrastructure would make you an accessory to a municipal violation, which feels like a technicality worth noting.

The practical photography takeaway is minimal, since giraffe-on-telephone-pole scenarios are rare in Atlanta. But the law is a reminder that American municipal codes contain multitudes.

4. Photographing a Man with a Horse on Sundays in Denver

Denver, Colorado has an old ordinance on the books that prohibits photographing a man with a horse within city limits on Sundays. The historical origin of this law is murky — theories range from religious Sabbath observance concerns to some now-forgotten incident involving a specific photograph — but it technically remains in municipal code.

Denver's Sunday horse-photography prohibition is one of those laws that exists in the ambient background of American legal oddity without causing practical problems for working photographers. But if you're shooting a western-themed senior portrait session in Denver on a Sunday, technically speaking, you have been warned.

5. No Trespassing Through Your Camera Lens in Montana

Montana law is explicit about a certain kind of photographic trespass: taking photographs of a person without their permission while you are inside a building constitutes a form of illegal surveillance, even if the subject is in a public or semi-public space.

This is actually a more practically relevant law than some others on this list. The general principle — that you cannot photograph someone in a space where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy — is broadly consistent across states. Montana's specific formulation extends that concept in ways that affect how photographers work in and around buildings.

For portrait photographers working in Montana, the lesson is clear: get permission, get releases, and be thoughtful about shooting through windows or doorways.

6. No Photographing Game Fish in Tennessee

Tennessee's wildlife law includes restrictions on photographing game animals, and interpretations have extended this to include fish in certain contexts. The law is primarily aimed at documenting illegal wildlife activity, but it's been applied broadly enough that photographers working with wildlife in Tennessee should be aware of it.

The more significant practical lesson for wildlife photographers in any state: know the regulations at your specific location. State parks, wildlife management areas, and national forests each have their own rules about commercial photography permits, drone use, and approach distances for wildlife. These vary significantly and change periodically.

7. Minors in Darkrooms Without Consent in California

California law requires parental or guardian written consent for minors to work in commercial darkrooms. This law dates from a period when darkroom chemicals — developer, stop bath, fixer, and various other processing compounds — posed genuine occupational health concerns, particularly for young people with developing respiratory and nervous systems.

The law is a useful reminder that photography involves chemistry with real health implications. Most of the traditional darkroom chemical exposure concerns are less relevant in the age of digital photography, but anyone still working with film and wet printing should ensure that anyone under 18 working in that environment has appropriate consent and protective equipment.

8. You're Required to Smile in Pocatello, Idaho

Pocatello, Idaho has a longstanding municipal ordinance — it's a real ordinance, though it's essentially ceremonial at this point — requiring residents to smile in public. The law has never been meaningfully enforced as a photography regulation, but it exists in the peculiar space between actual legal instrument and civic identity.

The photograph-related reading: if you're shooting street portraits in Pocatello, you're technically working in a jurisdiction where subject matter is legally encouraged to cooperate. Whether this helps with the classic reluctant-subject problem is an open question.

9. Drive-By Photography Ban in Dyersburg, Tennessee

Dyersburg, Tennessee prohibits taking photographs from a moving vehicle — with a specific exemption for photographs taken at carnivals. The law appears to have been written at a time when certain types of photography from vehicles raised safety or privacy concerns in specific contexts, and the carnival exemption suggests it may have had something to do with capturing carnival attractions in transit.

For photographers who do a lot of drive-by or car-window shooting — a legitimate technique in documentary and street photography — this is a reminder that vehicle-based photography is regulated more strictly in some jurisdictions than others. Know the rules at your location.

10. Mississippi's Indirect Photography Regulation

Mississippi has various public morality statutes that don't specifically address photography but have been interpreted to constrain certain types of documentation and display. Without going into the specific legal details, the takeaway for working photographers in Mississippi is the same as anywhere: understand the local regulatory environment, particularly for commercial work, and ensure you have appropriate permits and releases.

What This Means for Photographers in Practice

Most working photographers will never encounter any of these specific laws. But they point toward a broader lesson that's genuinely relevant: photography law is not a single unified system. It's a collection of federal law, state law, municipal ordinance, and private property rules that vary significantly by location and context.

A few principles that hold broadly across jurisdictions:

In public spaces, you generally have the right to photograph what's visible. People, architecture, events — if it's visible from a public space, you can generally photograph it. The line gets complicated when the photography moves from documentation into surveillance or harassment.

Commercial photography is regulated differently than personal photography. Using images commercially — in advertising, for sale, in editorial contexts — often requires model releases from identifiable individuals and property releases from certain private properties. What you can shoot freely for your own use may require additional permissions when money is involved.

Private property rules apply regardless of public photography rights. A shopping mall, a restaurant, a hotel — these are private properties where the owner can set the photography rules regardless of what public law says. Get permission before shooting commercially on private property.

Drone photography has its own regulatory layer entirely. FAA regulations, local ordinances, and property rules all apply simultaneously and don't always align. If you're incorporating drone work into your photography, know all three layers before you fly.

For my work on the South Shore — senior portrait packages, family photos, professional submission portraits, and more — the legal landscape is relatively straightforward. Massachusetts has clear public photography rights, strong model release requirements for commercial work, and the usual private property considerations. Knowing the rules makes it easier to focus on the work itself.

Ready to Book Your Session?

If you have questions about what to expect from a professional photography session on the South Shore, reach out through the contact page and I'm happy to walk you through the process.

Session pricing & packages